So Trump is in. It appears Republicans have no excuses now.
The break between fall and winter sports is going to be maximum for our MACA student-athletes.
I will disclose that I continue to think the term "student athlete" has a faint sanctimonious ring to it. That's because it suggests these students are special in a way that suggests virtue.
Are they special? Yes they are. They get into the limelight with talents that attract ticket-buying fans. People put down money to see it. Even though these are just kids in development. Their skills in sports would seem not to apply all that much to the adult life that awaits them.
You can counter that by saying the kids make a time commitment that shields them from unhealthy temptations. Granted. Also, you might suggest they develop good time management skills. They need a certain degree of self-discipline just to maximize their sports talents. And we expect the local news media to treat these kids as super-special.
The number of teams/programs has expanded exponentially through the years. Because the trend has taken a lot of time to be realized, we may not appreciate the burgeoning nature. The sense of importance it projects can bring pushback from certain people. OK I have an example.
I remember when girls hockey was being "sold" to the school board. I'll use again the word "sanctimonious." I'm sure my characterization would irritate certain people. But some of us, I guess, would like to look out for the interests of kids who have very real talents and interests that are outside of sports.
Look at the big school musical - it gets a boffo amount of public response. The overall media attention for this and other pursuits outside of sports is small. When girls hockey was on the drawing board for our school, the newspaper had an editor who actually wrote on how the hyperbole was spewing forth. Those are my words of course. I think it's an accurate paraphrase. After so many years I can only paraphrase of course.
Remember it was not me writing the contrarian comments, it was someone else at the paper. This writer reacted to a final presentation that sought to "seal the deal" for the creation of girls hockey.
The writer wondered: "Aren't we just talking about establishing a new sports team?"
The answer: yes. But the rhetoric from the sport's advocates was over the top shall we say. These individuals "suggested that their proposal wasn't just for a new sports program," the writer continued, "it was for 'a life-changing experience for the kids.' "
That's a close paraphrase and I do specifically remember the words "life-changing experience."
Indeed the zealousness of sports parents can on the whole be over-the-top. Maybe this is best supported by their expectations for local media.
I used to cover theater by taking a few rehearsal photos leading up to the show, then maybe taking a couple of photos backstage during makeup application on the big night(s). Filled the bill, I felt, but was hardly comparable to the demands thrust on me for sports.
Gateway, maybe?
The kids are very young and impressionable when they first get attracted to sports. They can't help but notice the adulation the best athletes get. They can't help but notice the thundering cheers from assembled fans when the local teams do well in the playoffs.
Again, the growth of all sports has been exponential. Parents are being divided into more programs. Girls sports existed not at all in Morris until 1971. Organized hockey existed on a "sandlot" level before the Lee Center went up. Now hockey including girls hockey has the big-time trappings.
I remember going out to the outdoor rink one year to get a photo or two of a playoff game: the game was cancelled because of the Vikings being on TV in a playoff game on that day. Kind of a ragtag arrangement.
Back in 2012 I wrote a blog post with the heading "Remembering growth of hockey in Morris." I wrote that hockey was like "the little engine that could" here. Here is the link::
So hockey is nice but it does not need the hype of "life-changing experience." It's a constructive activity just like the school musical, band, choir and other things.
And what about this sea change: no more shop classes? Can someone explain why this went gone with the wind? Learning to "work with your hands": isn't that an asset?
Unfortunately, the shop class enthusiasts from when my generation of boomers was growing up had an image of being rather "ruffians." These were boys who shall we say were inclined to get in trouble sometimes. "My crowd" might even poke a little fun at them. And of course that was totally misguided. But we were kids.
My perceptions of the "shop students" of old were reinforced by some YouTube-based commenting I came across. "Shop" tended to attract "troubled" students, the host opined. And might I add we're talking "boys," as girls didn't take shop nor were they in sports. They were in "home economics."
My missive today began with the thought that our MACA "student-athletes" have maximum break time now between the fall the winter seasons. Might they be tempted to drift away from sports some?
How do the football players feel? This team had such an outstanding regular season record, yet they played a mere one game in the playoffs. That's a head-scratcher. Our first game was against a mighty strong team: D-G-F.
These football players began their journey in the sport when they were very young of course, impressionable.
This is the thing I warn about with football all the time. The young kids respond to stimuli like the sense they can draw waves of cheers from a big throng of fans at a fancy football facility (like we have) if they are big, fast, coordinated and can outperform a team of opposing athletes who are just like them. Why must they be adversaries?
Why do the fans of one team feel they must be adversaries of the folks of a rival town? Hey we're all the same. All my life I have seen these things get over-heated. I remember when an opposing school announced that the Morris fans were welcome to attend a pre-game gathering with snacks at the opponent's venue. I couldn't help but think "fraternization!"
Hey, these fans were all going to cheer for their own kids knocking the opponents on their keisters within minutes! Isn't there a better way to offer nurturing activities to kids? Without the violence and the too-emotional rooting for "wins?"
Bless the kids in the MAHS school musical. It is most uplifting and enriching. No "head injuries," that's for sure. So why do we put up with that in football? People would say "well, that's the way it's always been." Nice rationalization.
OK so why did Trump win? The unspoken truth IMHO is that America is not willing to elect a female president. This has been demonstrated twice now.
- Brian Williams - morris mn minnesota - bwilly73@yahoo.com