Lest we think this stability is no big deal, consider what is happening at
some other colleges around Minnesota. Moorhead State has storm clouds over it.
The Star Tribune gave us the recent headline: "Moorhead U eyes drastic cuts."
The institution was called "Moorhead State College" when I was young, then
it became "University," then we saw the change to the cumbersome name "Minnesota
State University-Moorhead (MSUM)." Clarity was better served when the name
started out with the city name. At any rate, adjusting the name hasn't appeared
to help.
"Facing dropping enrollment and a $5 million deficit," the Star Tribune
article read, "the state university in Moorhead says it may cut or eliminate
programs in more than half of its departments, mostly affecting the liberal
arts."
The liberal arts! This is what our University of Minnesota-Morris has
always stood for. The conventional wisdom out and about, is that the venerated
"liberal arts" are prime candidates for cutbacks. And yet our UMM shows no signs
of being in panic mode, as might be suggested about MSUM.
The November 28 Star Tribune article continued: "Last week, officials at
Minnesota State University-Moorhead notified chairs of 18 of its 31 departments
that they could face significant cutbacks in fields such as philosophy, mass
communications, history, political science, theater arts and English."
A column in the online journal Slate gives MSUM's retrenchment national
attention. Slate treated the issues at MSUM like they might be indicative of
what's happening nationally. Thus MSUM becomes something of a poster child.
We're reminded of when the Wall Street Journal made the U of M its poster child
for alleged administrative bloat at education institutions. Remember that?
Institutions recoil at such attention. They deny such assertions or, more
often, suggest that facts are misinterpreted, cherry-picked or taken out of
context. The defensiveness is understandable. Institutions are organisms with
self-interest to pursue. They may be facing forces of change that are simply a
consequence of the world we live in today.
Those who resist those forces can be seen as like the old baseball scouts
in the movie "Moneyball," shocked and angry over how their profession was being
transformed.
The pinch felt in Duluth
Let's move past Moorhead State and its woes. Elsewhere in Minnesota we are
seeing similar spasms. My oh my, it's even happening within the U of M system,
meaning the 'U' itself can't be viewed as a sacred cow. The U of M at Duluth
intends to cut $12 million over the next five years. Officials say they'll
identify most of the first wave of cuts on February 1. The school could see the
elimination of up to two low-enrollment degrees. Plus there's talk of layoffs of
part-time faculty, and consolidation of some academic departments.
We learn from the MPR "On Campus" blog that UMD is reviewing every program
and service, academic and non-academic, to see if it might be scaled back.
Prudent though this might be, it's kind of a bummer to work in this kind of
situation. When will we as a society get tired of this mantra of consolidation
and efficiencies? In theory such aims are fine. I do feel maximum efficiency
makes people weary, like zombies after a while.
The pinch felt in Northfield
For as long as I can remember, Northfield, that place where the James gang
was crushed, has had two colleges: Carleton and St. Olaf. For most of my life,
that situation was deemed just fine. In theory, though, two colleges in a
community the size of Northfield seems rather clunky and impractical.
Now, that reality is being acknowledged. We learn from the MPR blog
(managed most capably by Alex Friedrich) that "St. Olaf and Carleton are teaming
up to save costs. A $1.4 million grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
will have them jointly run some areas of their information technology,
administration and even academic programming."
The St. Olaf president is quoted saying that such sharing promotes
efficiency. The Carleton president talks about the possibility of "joint
courses" between the two schools.
Why now? Often, "consolidation" is a reflection of decline. A merger of the
two schools might even be practical. By staying separate, though, they can keep
their respective donors in a better mood for continuing to cut the checks.
I don't think Jonathan Capehart would be pleased if the schools merged.
Capehart is a favorite social and political commentator of mine. He's often on
the "Morning Joe" panel on MSNBC television. He's a product of Carleton College,
class of 1989, and mentions this occasionally for his national audience. He's
African-American and sometimes speaks from the perspective of that historically
disadvantaged faction. I was amused when someone designed a custom coffee mug
honoring Capehart, a mug with a drawing that caricatured Capehart with
extra-large glasses. I wish I could obtain this mug.
I attended a state university which I'm sure is grappling with the same
challenges as Moorhead State. I know for a fact that St. Cloud State has
undergone some streamlining. Is more in store? Might it be like a snowball
rolling downhill? Do you not dare let this process start?
St. Cloud State made headlines when it canceled Homecoming. This was a
desperation move by the institution to rid itself of its rather celebrated
reputation for frivolity. There was a time when people thought this reputation
was cute. "Oh, look at those cute kids, setting fires to dumpsters for
Homecoming."
But we live in more serious times today. We look at the objectives for
school and we insist that the school focus entirely on those objectives. Or
else.
Or else there will be funding cuts and a drop in enrollment.
At Moorhead State - I can't bring myself to always call it "Minnesota State
University-Moorhead" - the president actually said some decline in enrollment
was intentional. Hoo boy. They must really be whistling past the graveyard. I
mean, when you have to spin bad news as good.
We learn that in 2010, Moorhead State decided it was admitting too many
unqualified students. The institution began referring these students to
community and technical colleges, you know, the schools that take all the
dummies (LOL).
The MSUM president stated that for many years, 15-20 per cent of the
freshmen who were admitted didn't meet its published admission standards.
Moorhead wasn't alone. We hear "it was a common practice at many universities as
they struggled to keep their classrooms full."
And, "many of the students were
failing."
Failing.
I often feel as though institutions of higher learning make knowledge seem
too elusive. Young people actually do want to learn. They just need to feel as
though their learning is going to be relevant to their future. Colleges make
knowledge seem elusive or distant partly out of self-interest. If such knowledge
were easily grasped, we might not need such well-credentialed professors who are
able to make a living doing this. The students end up like the rabbit
chasing the carrot on the stick.
Today of course, we can all bypass educational institutions of all types
and access knowledge online - no limitations at all.
Is this reality the biggest source of stress for college campuses now? The
realization that, frankly, they simply aren't needed as much now? That they
might be likened to those old baseball scouts in "Moneyball?"
Much of the knowledge gained in the liberal arts seems archaic. The Slate
article about MSUM warned that "students best get their Romeo and Juliet now,
because schools like Moorhead may soon have no department of English, physics or
history."
We might put Mozart and Beethoven beside Romeo and Juliet. Such subject
matter seems elite/highbrow with its status. But is the status becoming empty
and irrelevant? To be blunt, the music of the Beatles reflects as much
sophistication and artistic craftsmanship as the so-called "classical"
composers.
Why is it that the creations of long ago are treated as so special? There's
no rational reason. You can actually argue that Edgar Allan Poe abused the
English language. And yet his works are propped up in academia. Many talented
and inspired people are at work today, giving us materials that have just as
much merit, but we're not supposed to be as awestruck by people doing it today.
OK, people are steadily seeing through those pretensions. The electronic
media revolution has been totally liberating and democratizing. Special
knowledge is no longer exclusive.
We may already be able to assert we simply don't need college libraries
anymore. Ouch.
The realities are setting in at Moorhead State, that "poster
child" in the eyes of Slate. Or St. Cloud State, that school which once prompted
amusement with its status as "party college."
No more amusement. No more status quo. No more entitled feeling, based only
on the suggested virtues of "higher education."
Higher education is in a jungle now, a jungle in which it must confront the
buzzwords of "efficiency" and "consolidation."
As "Count Floyd" of the old SCTV
television show would say: "Brrrr, scary."
Except at the University of Minnesota-Morris. At least not yet. Let's pinch
ourselves.
- Brian Williams - morris mn minnesota - bwilly73@yahoo.com